27
May
09

You can be gay – just don’t be happy

Imagine you’re a child. Imagine you’re a child who never got to have bubblegum – just chewing gum. Now all the grown ups kept saying that it did the same thing, it contained sugar and that it was still sweet. But all the little kids in the playground had bubblegum. You had chewing gum.

Lets start this easily long-winded discussion on gay marriage with our friends in the US, the leaders of the free world.

In Australia’s relationship with the US, the US is the Britney Spears of the family; the older, crazier, more famous and more radical sibling. When it comes to kicking conservatism to the curb, the US are second to none.

If you’re not Sarah Palin you may know that the US Supreme Court decision in Roe v Wade made it legal for a woman to terminate a pregnancy for any reason up until the point where the “foetus becomes viable”, seven months.  Heck, if you’re not Sarah Palin you probably know a lot of things.

Let’s also not forgot the ingenious Bill of Rights which protects the much needed right to bear firearms.

So in supposedly the greatest country in the world, you can kill babies that are two months from birth and you can risk the lives of millions of schoolkids in high school massacres which seem to be as frequent as Jennifer Aniston attempting to release another blockbuster. Apologies, her first blockbuster.

Despite having laws in place that risk lives, the California Supreme Court ruled in May to uphold Proposition 8. Arguably one of the more liberal states in the US continues to treat gay and lesbian citizens as second-class people who do not have the same access to rights as heterosexuals.

When we look at the situation in Australia, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. In fact this Australian apple was dropped on the head as a child.

The US allows abortion for any reason up to seven months. Australia, with the exclusion of one state, only allows abortion under strict circumstances as prescribed by a doctor. The US allows the right to bare firearms. Australia amended the Firearms Act in 2008 after years of lobbying only so far as to make it easier to obtain a license.

We lag behind. And with gay marriage, we lag even further. It’s not even lagging behind in a cute way like Eric the Eel. It’s more the sort of lagging the really big contestant does in a Biggest Loser challenge – painful to watch and almost beyond hope.

When all is said, when it’s all done and dusted and the fat lady has sung (probably that same Biggest Loser contestant) the anti-gay marriage argument boils down to two main points.

The first is that the term marriage is sacred and has religious origins that have permeated throughout history. A marriage is between a man and a woman.

The second is that gay people do not make good parents.

In regards to the first issue the first thing is obvious. How religious are we? No really, just think about it. Australian heroes are footballers. Married footballers engage in controversially consented group sex. Need I say more?

Furthermore, this preoccupation that a marriage is sacred between only a man and a woman is ludicrous. This has meant that in Australia homosexuals can only be a de facto couple – not a married couple. You can have chewing gum, just makes sure you stay right away from that special bubblegum.

On one hand, I get it. If homosexuals get the same rights as married heterosexuals when it comes to health insurance, tax, parenting and separation – then maybe homosexuals just need to ‘get over it’. Maybe “marriage” is just a term churchgoers are in love with and homosexuals should leave it alone.

But how just is that?

That argument rests on the fact society is willing to give homosexual couples everything – just not the word “marriage”.

But if it is just a term, isn’t it more humane to lean on the side that encourages happiness rather than the one that denies rights?

The second argument is equally as intelligent as George Bush trying to push doors that don’t open. The argument that children need both a male and female figure in the early stages of their lives is valid. Controversial and potentially as weak as Britney’s singing, but it is valid.

Firstly, what about single parents? Are we saying that all single parents are horrible people because they are denying a child to be immersed in the environment a heterosexual couple can offer them? That’s right, because the single-parent families which make up 14 per cent of all families in Australia are breeding anti-social, mentally challenged and depressed left-wing criminals.

Oh and all those heterosexual parents – they’re doing a fantastic job. Please take a moment to applaud them. Please take a moment to applaud those awesome kids on P plates who speed and take the lives of innocent people. Let’s also congratulate the refined skills of Corey Worthington’s parents. I take my hat off.

So while states in the US continue to uphold Proposition 8 and Australia continues to live in denial, many people will be celebrating. Many people will be jumping up and down that some human beings can’t adopt or foster children, won’t be able to file joint tax returns and are unable to tick the “married” boxes when filling out forms. What a win for them.

Meanwhile, others just want to be happy.


5 Responses to “You can be gay – just don’t be happy”


  1. 1 Joeline Le
    May 27, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    I agree that the stance on gay marriage here is ridiculous. My thoughts; create a new term that applies to homosexual relationships if the term ‘marriage’ has such sacred connotations. Fairly simple, don’t you think?
    One moment while I argue for the opposing side though. One issue that I think must be addressed before this can even begin coming into fruition is whether priests and religious figures would be able to be marriage (or whatever the term will be) celebrants for homosexual couples.
    The problem would be if a gay couple approached a priest to be their celebrant and he were to refuse, there would be grounds for the couple to sue the priest (and the very very wealthy church) for discrimination. So that issue is something that needs to be looked at further.
    Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem like they’ll be looking at any of these issues, or even the option of gay marriage with this government session. (Don’t get the wrong idea, I’m not a liberal, Kevin Rudd just stated at the beginning of his term that he personally doesn’t believe in gay marriage, and it wasn’t a policy he campaigned for).

    Point is, I agree!

  2. 2 colsnews
    May 27, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    yeah good point. on all counts. it’s just sad people are so caught up on one term though? especially then it means they can keep this word and rest happily in bed while others are denied rights?

    woot to the 21st century and developed world.

    and the religion thing. true. but looks like an obstacle Australia won’t have to think about for a while.

  3. 3 David
    May 28, 2009 at 8:25 am

    Guys, it is a very important word! One that has lost a lot of its meaning in the last 50 years. Has become very diluted. Marriage is supposed to be a permanent bond between a man and a woman before God. This is what it’s been for 1800 years, until people stepped in and secularized it.

  4. 4 colsnews
    May 28, 2009 at 9:17 am

    fair enough. i respect religion. but if the term really has lost it’s true/core meaning and atheists can get married not in front of a church – then clearly this term has been stretched to allow other people to share it as well.

    • 5 David
      May 28, 2009 at 9:51 am

      I agree. Maybe they should term it ‘civil union’ or ‘civil marriage’, and then maybe church leadership wouldn’t be so….strident.

      But you have to understand that the church today, especially the Catholic Church, is interested in leading all possible souls down the path to ultimate union with God. People don’t like it when they’re told that things they’re doing are just wrong, and they shout things like “they’re taking away my freedom!”. Freedom is not being able to do whatever you want to do. That is license. Authentic freedom is the power to do what we ought to do; the power to choose the good, the true, and the beautiful. That will vanquish fear every time. If your concept of freedom is really license, fear will come out on top every time. Freedom has to be united with truth. There is no freedom outside of the truth: No authentic human freedom outside of the truth. “If you are truely my diciples, you will abide in my word. You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.” True freedom is rooted in God.

      So the interest is not to condemn all gay people to hell-that’s God’s decision. We’re trying to get them ready before it’s too late. Once we die, we have no more ability to choose between good and evil. That’s when we’re truly judged and condemned or commended…


Leave a Reply